Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS51
Table of contents:
| # | Bridgestone Turanza T005 | Kumho Ecsta HS51 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R22 | R14 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The comparison here is between two summer tyres - the Bridgestone Turanza T005 and the Kumho Ecsta HS51. These tyres, produced by Bridgestone and Kumho respectively, have undergone numerous tests to determine their capabilities and weaknesses. A careful analysis of these test results can provide a detailed overview of each tyre, aiding in your decision-making process.
The Bridgestone Turanza T005, crafted in Europe, is a touring tyre that has earned 89% in our rating. It particularly excelled in the ADAC and Autozeitung tests, securing the 2nd and 5th positions respectively, out of a variety of tyres. This tyre demonstrates remarkable dry braking and interior noise reduction, as noticed in the ADAC test. In the Autobild test, the Turanza T005 stood out with its low rolling resistance, key to fuel efficiency and ease in handling.
On the other hand, although the Kumho Ecsta HS51 manufactured in China scored less in our rating at 45%, it exhibited noteworthy features that earned it higher positions in some tests. Notably, it ranked 3rd in Autobild's test among 53 tyres, impressing with its wet handling, aquaplaning resistance, and price-value ratio. This tyre also exhibited good aquaplaning resistance and fuel efficiency in the ADAC's test but ranked lower at 10th position. In the Autozeitung test, the tyre performed well in resisting longitudinal aquaplaning but was 9th in ranking.
Indeed, both tyres show strengths in different areas, with the Bridgestone Turanza T005 being a stronger performer overall in testing. However, the Kumho Ecsta HS51 presents itself as a solid choice for value for money, offering some great features despite a lower ranking.
One important aspect to note is the replacement of the Kumho Ecsta HS51 by the Kumho Ecsta HS52. As tyre technology progresses, newer models may offer enhanced features and improved performance. Therefore, considering the latest model could be advantageous.
In conclusion, while the Bridgestone Turanza T005 provides higher performance as a touring tyre, the Kumho Ecsta HS51 offers valuable features at a potentially lower price point. Your choice of tyre would depend on what you prioritize - superior performance or good value for money.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Exemplary2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry driving behavior
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Kumho Ecsta HS51 ? dB
Offroad
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel efficiency
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS51 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 35,4 | 31,6 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS51 | 34,8 | 30,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,4 | 2,7 | 0,6 | |||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 2,1 | 2,0 | 3,2 | 2,5 | |||
| Kumho Ecsta HS51 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,2 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 2,0 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,2 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Recommended | 2,3 | 1,9 | 2,6 | 2,0 | 1,4 | ||
| Kumho Ecsta HS51 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,2 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,5 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 277 | 142 | 135 | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 239 | 112 | 127 | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS51 | 181 | 73 | 108 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||