10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

#	Bridgestone Potenza Sport /92%	Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 /81%

Dimensions	R17 - R22	R17 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Both the Bridgestone Potenza Sport and the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 are Ultra High-Performance (UUHP) summer tyres. Each has its strengths and weaknesses, culminating in different test ratings—92% for Bridgestone Potenza Sport and 82% for Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 from our testing team. However, comparing results from different test scenarios allows for a more comprehensive analysis for the purpose of making sound buying decisions. Continue reading to find more about these two tyres.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

The Bridgestone Potenza Sport boasts excellent wet handling and grip, achieving the fastest lap time among its group, and impressive wet braking. Notably, this tyre, produced by Bridgestone, also stood out for its low rubber particulate matter, rendering it an environmental choice.

Yet, it has its downsides too. In the cooler wet braking test, the Bridgestone dropped more than some competitors. Moreover, it exhibited considerable wear after just three laps on a demanding circuit, potentially signaling longevity issues when used on circuits. Lastly, it struggles in deeper water (in the aquaplaning tests) and has high rolling resistance, which could affect fuel efficiency.

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127

On the other hand, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 scores points for its commendable wet grip, low energy use, and excellent value for money. Produced by Hankook, this tyre is an OE fitment for high-end cars like the Audi Q8, SQ8, Porsche Cayenne, and BMW X3.

However, one noticeable drawback is the sluggish steering response, more akin to comfort-biased tyres than sports tyres. It also falls short in aquaplaning resistance and might let you down in severe wet conditions.

Verdict

Using data from multiple tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport outperforms the Hankook in wet and dry braking, handling, and cornering, while the Hankook offers a quieter ride, lower fuel consumption, and a better price-performance ratio. Although the Bridgestone Potenza Sport achieves a higher overall rating, your selection between these two tyres would depend more on your performance requisites, ride comfort preferences, and budget. Keep those factors in consideration when deciding between the Bridgestone Potenza Sport and the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127.

Segment

1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Premium

2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Premium

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport 132

2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 109

Number of tests

1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 18x

2. Bridgestone Potenza Sport 17x

Best position in test

1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 1.

2. Bridgestone Potenza Sport 1.

Worst position in test

1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport 6.

2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 14.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport 3.47

2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 6.22

Year of the last test

1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport 2024

2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 2024

Best rating in test

1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Exemplary

2. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Very good

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Good

2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Satisfactory

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Potenza Sport
85%

Hankook
Ventus S1 evo3 K127
71%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport 90%

2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 84%

Wet braking

1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 94%

2. Bridgestone Potenza Sport 86%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport 72%

2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 66%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport 67%

2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 45%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport 93%

2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 81%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport ?

2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Potenza Sport
85%

Hankook
Ventus S1 evo3 K127
74%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport 79%

2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 73%

Dry braking

1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport 90%

2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 88%

Offroad

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Potenza Sport
82.2%

Hankook
Ventus S1 evo3 K127
?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Ventus S1 evo3 K127
70%

Bridgestone
Potenza Sport
69%

Exterior noise

1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 77%

2. Bridgestone Potenza Sport 61%

Comfort

1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport 78%

2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 65%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport 72 dB

2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 ? dB

Costs

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Ventus S1 evo3 K127
76%

Bridgestone
Potenza Sport
56%

Rolling resistance

1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 76%

2. Bridgestone Potenza Sport 56%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 ?

2. Bridgestone Potenza Sport ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Tyre Reviews Summer tyre test 2023 225/40 R18

Name
Best values in test	1
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Rating: Recommended	1
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Recommended	1
Show test details

ACE Summer tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	71	54	19	7
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Rating: Highly recommended	67	53	15	5
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Highly recommended	62	50	17	6
Show test details