Segment
1. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than Vredestein (55%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Potenza S001 was done in 2015, compared to 2018 when was the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 245/30 R20 test, where both the Potenza S001 and the Ultrac Vorti R were tested.
# | Bridgestone Potenza S001
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R19 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Premium
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Exemplary2. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Satisfactory
2. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Conditionally recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | ||||
Bridgestone Potenza S001 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3+ | 2 | ||||
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2 | 2+ | ||||
Show test details |