Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Nokian WR SUV 4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Bridgestone (46%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 92% compared to 65% of the Nokian WR SUV 4. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Nokian WR SUV 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 235/55 R18 test, where both the Blizzak LM-005 and the WR SUV 4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A wet grip rating, whereas 89% of Nokian WR SUV 4 has C rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Blizzak LM-005 is made in Italy/Hungary/Poland and WR SUV 4 is made in Russian Federation.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | Nokian WR SUV 4 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R22 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Test winner2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Good2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Snow
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 72 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | ||
| Nokian WR SUV 4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 2- | 2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 386 | 143 | 138 | 118 | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Highly recommended | 386 | 143 | 136 | 107 | |||
| Nokian WR SUV 4 | 347 | 107 | 133 | 107 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||