Segment
1. Nokian WR D3 Upper-middle2. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. In this particular case, the Nokian WR D3 has a better rating of 47% compared to 44% of the Barum Polaris 3. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2015 185/60 R15 test, where both the Polaris 3 and the WR D3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Barum Polaris 3 has C wet grip rating, whereas 56% of Nokian WR D3 has B rating.
# | Barum Polaris 3 | Nokian WR D3 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R13 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian WR D3 Upper-middle2. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost
2. Nokian WR D3 10.
2. Nokian WR D3 17.
1. Barum Polaris 3 10.62. Nokian WR D3 13.5
1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary
1. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory
1. Barum Polaris 3 ? dB2. Nokian WR D3 ? dB
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Exemplary | 2- | 2 | 2+ | 2- | |||
Nokian WR D3 Rating: - | 2- | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
Barum Polaris 3 | 40,8 | 28,6 | |||||
Nokian WR D3 | 42,7 | 28,2 | |||||
Show test details |