Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Apollo winter tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Kumho (48%). In this particular case, the Apollo Aspire XP Winter has a better rating of 82% compared to 54% of the Kumho WinterCraft WP71. The first tyre test of Apollo Aspire XP Winter was done in 2019, compared to 2016 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP71 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the Aspire XP Winter and the WinterCraft WP71 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Apollo Aspire XP Winter | Kumho WinterCraft WP71 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R16 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter Lowcost
1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter Exemplary2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Satisfactory
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Conditionally recommended
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
Apollo Aspire XP Winter | 35,1 | 25,3 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 | 35,7 | 28 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 1- | |||
Apollo Aspire XP Winter Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 1- | |||
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 2+ | 3+ | 2 | 3 | |||
Show test details |