Segment
2. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Apollo (57%). In this particular case, the Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 has a better rating of 78% compared to 65% of the Apollo Alnac 4G Winter. The first tyre test of Apollo Alnac 4G Winter was done in 2024, compared to 2022 when was the Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Alnac 4G Winter and the W462 Winter i*cept RS3 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Apollo Alnac 4G Winter
| Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Lowcost
1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Highly recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2 | 2 | |||
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2- | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
Apollo Alnac 4G Winter | 36.4 | 30.6 | |||||
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 | 37.8 | 29.1 | |||||
Show test details |