• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: tyres similar to Nokian Powerproof

Looking for a comparison of Nokian Powerproof to tyres that are made in similar dimensions? Here you can find detailed information based on tests, reviews and manufacturer's data.

# Nokian Powerproof
/71%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
/81%
Falken Azenis FK510
/74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
/77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
/76%
Uniroyal RainSport 3
/51%
Uniroyal RainSport 5
/72%
Fulda SportControl 2
/84%
Firestone Roadhawk
/72%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR17 - R20 R17 - R22 R17 - R99 R16 - R22 R14 - R20 R14 - R20 R15 - R21 R17 - R20 R15 - R21
Price
Remove

In this review, we will compare two summer tyres, the Nokian Powerproof and the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127. Both tyres come from reputable manufacturers, with the Nokian Powerproof being produced by the Finnish company Nokian Tyres and the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 by the South Korean manufacturer Hankook. Let's take a look at how these two tyres perform in various tests and their overall strengths and weaknesses.


AutoMotorSport Test: In this test, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 finished in 3rd place, out of 10 tested tyres. Its strengths include impressive dry lane changing, wet braking, and wet handling. On the other hand, the Nokian Powerproof finished in 6th place, with its best feature being its dry steering response.


automotorsport 2022 Test: The Nokian Powerproof is described as being neutrally handling with good precision and control in dry conditions. However, it does have some weaknesses in aquaplaning safety and a slight singing noise. The Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 is praised for its short wet braking distances and a safe and predictable behavior in wet conditions. But, it also has weaknesses in aquaplaning protection, limited dry cornering grip, and a slow steering response with noticeable noise.


Autozeitung Test: In this test, the Nokian Powerproof scored 6th place out of 10 tyres, whereas the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 ranked 9th.


Autobild Test: The Nokian Powerproof ranked 2nd out of 50 tyres in this test. Its best features were wet braking. The Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 placed 10th in this test.


ADAC Test: In this test, the Nokian Powerproof ranked 11th out of 16 tyres, with its strengths being noise and interior noise performance. The Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 finished in 14th place.


Overall, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 seems to have a slight advantage in most tests, especially in wet handling and braking. It's also commonly used as original equipment on high-performance vehicles such as Audi Q8, Audi SQ8, Porsche Cayenne, and BMW X3. The Nokian Powerproof also performs well, particularly in dry handling and steering response. However, it could be improved in the areas of aquaplaning safety and noise reduction.


In conclusion, both the Nokian Powerproof and Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 are solid summer tyres, each with their own strengths and weaknesses. Based on the test results, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 could be a better choice for those who prioritize wet performance, while the Nokian Powerproof might suit drivers who value precise dry handling and steering response. Ultimately, the choice of the best tyre will depend on your specific preferences and driving conditions.

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name WetDryEnviromental impact
Best values in test9,09,79,4
Nokian Powerproof
Rating: Good
7,68,07,3
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
Rating: Very good
8,58,06,3
Falken Azenis FK510
Rating: Good
7,57,06,3
Show test details
Name Points totalWetDry
Best values in test929393
Nokian Powerproof858387
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127786987
Falken Azenis FK510
Rating: Highly recommended
868983
Show test details
Name WetDryRunning costs
Best values in test11-1
Nokian Powerproof
Rating: Good
1- 2+2-
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
Rating: Satisfactory
2+2+3+
Falken Azenis FK510
Rating: Exemplary
221-
Kumho Ecsta PS71
Rating: Conditionally recommended
1 23-
Uniroyal Rainsport 3
Rating: Satisfactory
3+2-2+
Fulda SportControl 2
Rating: Good
22+2-
Firestone Roadhawk
Rating: Good
2+22-
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test32,128,7
Nokian Powerproof32,929,1
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K12734,730,3
Falken Azenis FK5103630,7
Kumho Ecsta PS7134,929
Uniroyal Rainsport 335,732,4
Fulda SportControl 234,231,7
Firestone Roadhawk34,330,8
Show test details
Name WetDryNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test1,71,32,82,01,6
Nokian Powerproof
Rating: Satisfactory
2,42,42,8 3,02,0
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
Rating: Satisfactory
3,12,03,42,51,8
Falken Azenis FK510
Rating: Satisfactory
2,42,93,02,0 2,0
Kumho Ecsta PS71
Rating: Satisfactory
2,32,43,33,02,0
Show test details