Looking for a comparison of Avon ZV7 to tyres that are made in similar dimensions? Here you can find detailed information based on tests, reviews and manufacturer's data.
In this article, we compare two summer tyres – the Avon ZV7 and the Kleber Dynaxer HP4. We will summarize the data from various tyre tests, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses, as well as their overall performance. By the end of this article, you will have a clearer understanding of which tyre performs better in different tests.
According to our rating system, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 scores 78%, while the Avon ZV7 has a lower score of 64%. It is important to note that neither of these tyres have been replaced by newer models.
In the ADAC test, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 ranked 12th out of 50 tyres, while the Avon ZV7 was positioned at a lower 42nd place. The Autobild 2018 test gave a mixed review for both tyres. The Avon ZV7 was praised for being relatively economical but criticized for its poor overall performance on dry roads, low mileage, high wear, and weak sustainability. On the other hand, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 was complimented for its good environmental performance, wear, efficiency, and mileage but was challenged for its balance on wet roads.
In the Autobild 2022 test, Kleber Dynaxer HP4 excelled in aquaplaning properties, short wet and dry braking distances, and driving comfort. However, it exhibited mediocre grip on wet surfaces, delayed steering response, and an understeering driving behavior on dry roads. During the same test, Avon ZV7 ranked 25th out of 53 tyres, whereas Kleber Dynaxer HP4 secured the 14th position. Both tyres were praised for their exterior noise levels, while the Kleber tyre received extra points for its driving comfort.
The ACE test results placed the Avon ZV7 in 9th place out of 9 tyres with a notable strength in exterior noise. The Kleber Dynaxer HP4 performed better, ranking 6th out of 9 tyres in the same test, and also scoring high in exterior noise levels.
Overall, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 appears to have a better performance in many tests compared to the Avon ZV7. It scores higher in brake performance, environmental characteristics, wear, and efficiency. However, its performance on wet surfaces and steering response may not be ideal. On the other hand, the Avon ZV7 is relatively more economical but suffers from weaknesses on dry roads, low mileage, and sustainability issues. Given the test results and reviews, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 seems to be the better choice among these two tyres for overall performance and reliability.
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle4. Cooper Zeon CS8 Upper-middle5. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle6. BF Goodrich g-Grip Upper-middle7. Avon ZV7 Lowcost8. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Lowcost9. Fulda SportControl 2 Lowcost
7. Avon ZV7 58
8. Avon ZV7 8.
9. Avon ZV7 42.
5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.587. Avon ZV7 18.558. BF Goodrich g-Grip 19.339. Cooper Zeon CS8 19.71
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary2. Fulda SportControl 2 Exemplary3. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary4. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended6. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Very good7. Cooper Zeon CS8 Satisfactory8. Avon ZV7 Satisfactory9. BF Goodrich g-Grip Satisfactory
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended2. Fulda SportControl 2 Satisfactory3. BF Goodrich g-Grip Satisfactory4. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended5. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended6. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended7. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Conditionally recommended8. Cooper Zeon CS8 Sufficient9. Avon ZV7 Sufficient
1. Fulda SportControl 2 70 dB3. Firestone Roadhawk 71 dB5. Cooper Zeon CS8 ? dB8. Avon ZV7 ? dB
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Avon ZV7 Rating: Sufficient | 4,1 | 3,9 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Good | 2,1 | 2,8 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 Rating: Sufficient | 3,3 | 3,6 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Good | 2,6 | 1,8 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 29,9 | |||||
| Maxxis Premitra HP5 | 37,3 | 28,9 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 39,1 | 31,3 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 37,7 | 32,8 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 36,5 | 29,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Avon ZV7 | 37,9 | 34,3 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 31,6 | |||||
| Maxxis Premitra HP5 | 35,0 | 32,2 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 38,0 | 34,5 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 | 36,5 | 29,6 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 35,7 | 31,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 61 | 56 | 20 | 8 | 18 | ||
| Avon ZV7 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 41 | 41 | 16 | 8 | 13 | ||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 45 | 47 | 17 | 8 | 12 | ||
| Maxxis Premitra HP5 Rating: Highly recommended | 60 | 51 | 15 | 7 | 18 | ||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 36 | 47 | 19 | 7 | 13 | ||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Conditionally recommended | 43 | 44 | 20 | 5 | 14 | ||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Recommended | 61 | 47 | 17 | 8 | 12 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
