Table of contents:
185/65 R14 Fulda Kristall Montero 3 variants
No
No
Fulda Kristall Montero 3 is a winter tyre made in total of 28 sizes, ranging from R13 to R13 - this particular dimension is R14, which means it fits to a 14 inch/355.6mm diameter wheel. 185/65 R14 is 30mm wider than the narrowest dimension (155) and 20mm narrower than the widest one (205). This tyre profile of 65 means the sidewall height of the tyre is 65% of the tyre width (185mm), which results in 120.25mm sidewall height. In 185/65 R14, there is only one possible speed index for Fulda Kristall Montero 3 - "T", which is good for speeds up to 190 km/h. In 185/65 R14, Kristall Montero 3 usually competes against Polaris 5, which is a tyre from Barum with a rating of 72%, compared to 29% of the Fulda in question.
185/65 R14 86 T
C
E
68dB
Fulda Kristall Montero 3 is made in 28 sizes, starting from 155/80 R13 up to 205/55 R16.
Similar tires
Fulda Kristall Montero 3 in tyre tests
Relevant tyre tests in same or similiar dimension (185/65 R14)
ADAC Winter tyre test 2022 185/65 R15
sufficient
Ranked #13 of 16
Finishing 13th out of 16 competitors, the Fulda Kristall Montero 3 garnered a final rating of 'Sufficient'. This tire exhibited markedly low wear, earning the highest marks in this aspect, alongside its low fuel consumption, distinguishing itself positively from its competitors. However, it displayed weaknesses on both dry and wet roads, leading to its downgraded assessment. Despite its commendable performance in snow braking and snow traction, where it excelled as the absolute best, its performance issues on dry and wet surfaces could not be overlooked. Consequently, though it showcased good properties on snow and ice, overall recommendations for the Kristall Montero 3 were tempered, classifying it as only conditionally recommendable.
sufficient
Ranked #13 of 16
Finishing 13th out of 16 competitors, the Fulda Kristall Montero 3 garnered a final rating of 'Sufficient'. This tire exhibited markedly low wear, earning the highest marks in this aspect, alongside its low fuel consumption, distinguishing itself positively from its competitors. However, it displayed weaknesses on both dry and wet roads, leading to its downgraded assessment. Despite its commendable performance in snow braking and snow traction, where it excelled as the absolute best, its performance issues on dry and wet surfaces could not be overlooked. Consequently, though it showcased good properties on snow and ice, overall recommendations for the Kristall Montero 3 were tempered, classifying it as only conditionally recommendable.
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Rolling resistance | Noise | Wear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,9 | 1,8 | 1,9 | 1,7 | 2,5 | 1,5 |
| Fulda Kristall Montero 3 | 3,7 | 3,6 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 2,0 | 2,9 | 1,5 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Montero 3 | 42,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Fulda Kristall Montero 3 | 3+ | 2- | 2+ | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 415 | 144 | 136 | 144 | |||
| Fulda Kristall Montero 3 | 317 | 93 | 98 | 126 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||