Firestone Roadhawk
Pros and cons
- Exceptional handling on the wet
- Very good aquaplaning resistance
- Great handling on dry roads
- Short braking distance on dry roads
- -
Competitors
The Firestone Roadhawk is a summer tire that has been tested by ADAC in various dimensions. Overall, it is not considered a top performer, as its weaknesses on wet roads and in handling hold it back from achieving high ratings. However, it does have some positive qualities, such as a good fuel efficiency and low wear. On dry roads, it performs satisfactorily, with good grip and precise steering, but at high temperatures, the grip decreases significantly. It also has an average level of rolling noise. In conclusion, while the Firestone Roadhawk may be recommended for those who value fuel efficiency and low wear, it is not the best choice for those who prioritize safety and handling in wet conditions.
Sizes
Firestone Roadhawk is made in 144 sizes, starting from 205/60 R0 up to 295/35 R21.
Firestone Roadhawk is ranked #71 of 858 summer tyres based on the results of tests carried out by Autobild 2023, ADAC 2023, and other organizations. Firestone Roadhawk belongs to the Upper-middle segment and is made by a manufacturer from USA. It is made in total of 144 sizes, 205/60 R0 being the smallest and 295/35 R21 the largest. This tyre was featured in tests 18 times, first test was carried in 2018. This model received the best possible rating in 1 tests. Eu ratings can provide interesting overview over the available dimensions - 96% of Firestone Roadhawk has "A" wet grip rating and most (98%) of the dimensions has "C" fuel-saving rating. Noise levels of most dimensions are average - 45% of them produce 71db noise, which result in "b" overall rating. It can be compared to Dynaxer HP3, which is a tyre from Kleber (France) and has a rating of 69%, compared to 71% of the Firestone in question. There was a braking test that featured both Kleber Dynaxer HP3 and Firestone Roadhawk held by autobild in 2018. On the wet, the Firestone stopped from 80km/h in 36,5m, whereas the competing Kleber took longer to stop - 37,7m. The results repeat on the dry, where the Firestone stopped earlier at the 35,2m mark, compared to 39,2m of the Kleber.
Similar tires
Timeline
2018
Firestone Roadhawk was tested 3x (Autobild,...)
2019
Firestone Roadhawk was tested 3x (ADAC,...)
2020
Firestone Roadhawk was tested 4x (ACE,...)
2021
Firestone Roadhawk was tested 3x (Autobild,...)
2022
Firestone Roadhawk was tested 3x (ADAC,...)
2023
Firestone Roadhawk was tested 2x (ADAC,...)
Achievements
Firestone Roadhawk in tyre tests
The Firestone Roadhawk, an upper-middle segment tyre, has undergone various tests and received an overall rating of 71%, which is not an ideal result for its category. In these tests, the tyre performed exceptionally well in certain aspects, obtaining some of the best values among its competitors.
In the ADAC Summer Tyre Test of 2022 for 185/65 R15, the Roadhawk boasted the best results for dry braking and wet circle cornering. Similarly, in the Autobild Summer Tyre Test of 2021 for 205/55 R16, it excelled in dry handling, wet handling, and wet side guide.
However, the tyre has faced some setbacks as well. In the Autobild Summer Tyre Test of 2023 for 225/45 R18, it ranked last among the 50 tyres tested, revealing room for improvement.
In conclusion, while the Firestone Roadhawk has shown strong performance in certain areas, its overall rating indicates that there is still potential for growth and development to compete more effectively within its segment.
All tyre tests where Firestone Roadhawk was featured:
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 2,7 | 2,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 67.7 | 30.9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 37,7 | 32,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 2,9 | 2,2 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 2,3 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,6 | 2,7 | 1 | 1,7 | ||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 2,8 | 2,2 | 3,7 | 2,0 | 2,4 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 35,7 | 31,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | |||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 4,9 | 2,8 | 3,0 | 2,5 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 34,3 | 30,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 61 | 56 | 20 | 8 | 18 | ||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 43 | 44 | 20 | 5 | 14 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 264 | 137 | 129 | ||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 121 | 75 | 121 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 2+ | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 3+ | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 | ||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 2,8 | 1,5 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,5 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 35,2 | 32 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 2+ | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 35,2 | 36,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 | ||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 2,2 | 1,7 | 3,7 | 2,5 | 2,2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
Test ratings distribution
| 100% (1x) | 95% (1x) | 85% (7x) | 75% (1x) | 0% (1x) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exemplary | Good | Satisfactory | Good | Conditionally recommended | Poor |
| 1x | 1x | 4x | 3x | 1x | 1x |
Ratings x Wheel size
| R15 | R16 | R17 | R18 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 90% (3x) | 87.5% (4x) | 53.3% (3x) | 85% (1x) |
Ratings x Width
| 185/xx Rxx | 195/xx Rxx | 205/xx Rxx | 215/xx Rxx | 225/xx Rxx | 245/xx Rxx |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85% (2x) | 100% (1x) | 88.3% (3x) | 80% (2x) | 42.5% (2x) | 85% (1x) |
FAQ
Is this tyre suitable for SUVs?
Yes, this tyre is also made in SUV sizes.