Segment
1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Falken (48%). In this particular case, the Falken EuroWinter HS01 has a better rating of 66% compared to 46% of the Sava Eskimo S3+. The first tyre test of Falken EuroWinter HS01 was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Sava Eskimo S3+ first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the EuroWinter HS01 and the Eskimo S3+ were tested. See more mutual tests below. We also know where EuroWinter HS01 is made - Turkey.
# | Falken EuroWinter HS01 | Sava Eskimo S3+ | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R13 - R21 | R13 - R16 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Lowcost
2. Sava Eskimo S3+ 12.2
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ Satisfactory2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ Conditionally recommended2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ 68 dB
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,8 | 2,1 | 1,9 | 2,2 | 2,6 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Recommended | 2,5 | 2,7 | 2,9 | 2,9 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
Sava Eskimo S3+ Rating: Conditionally recommended | 2,8 | 3,6 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 2,7 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,7 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 3,0 | 1,5 | 1,7 |
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,6 | 3,1 | 2,9 | 3,6 | 2,5 | 2,3 |
Sava Eskimo S3+ Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 3,3 | 1,9 | 2,4 | 3,5 | 2,5 | 2,2 |
Show test details |