Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Kumho (54%). In this particular case, the Continental PremiumContact 6 has a better rating of 87% compared to 41% of the Kumho Crugen HP91. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 235/50 R18 test, where both the PremiumContact 6 and the Crugen HP91 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Continental PremiumContact 6 has A wet grip rating, whereas 66% of Kumho Crugen HP91 has B rating. We also know where PremiumContact 6 is made - Slovakia/Germany/Czech Republic.
# | Continental PremiumContact 6 | Kumho Crugen HP91 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R16 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Upper-middle
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory
2. Kumho Crugen HP91 ? dB
1. Kumho Crugen HP91 100%
Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Recommended | 2 | 1- | 2 | ||||
Kumho Crugen HP91 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2 | ||||
Show test details |